The Bailout
Ron Paul speaks out about our proposed bailout billed to the taxpayers; it’s a zero-sum game. Inaction > action.
Comments
Categories
- Featured (492)
- Politics (251)
- Humor (191)
- No F***ing Way (187)
- Music (174)
- Business (173)
- Philosophy (162)
- Finance (147)
- Quotes (137)
- Seattle (125)
- Technology (114)
- Economics (102)
- Europe (97)
- Conversations (86)
- Emerging Markets (67)
- Must. Have. (66)
- Fashion (62)
- The Web (60)
- Photography (59)
- Cellphones (49)
- Out and About (41)
- Design (40)
- Travel (34)
- Responsible Population (32)
- Sports (31)
- Video (30)
- Gotham (28)
- What I'm Reading (28)
- City of Angels (26)
- History (24)
- Health (18)
- Restaurants (10)
- Movies (6)
- F1 (3)
- Art (3)
Links
Archive
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- August 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- June 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- March 2007
- July 2005
- May 2004
- July 1999



without treading into most of what Mr. Ron Paul mentions in the above video…I view the proposed government actions as being a form of solution to a more immediate technical-type market unpleasantness, perhaps like American equities in 1987. I suppose one of the major things to be affected by the proposed actions would revolve around balance sheet conditions. With a change in balance sheet conditions the demand for money to support current balance sheets items may chill-out a bit and reduce the immediate demand for money, helping to alleviate pressures in the money market slightly. However, how the suppliers of interbank dollars and other short term money view the risk overtime is beyond me. I suspect that when an agreement is reached dollars for less than 30 days will cost a bit less. The fundamental picture is still pretty bad in my opinion and will probably help to spur another round of extremely tight money in the relatively near future.
I don’t really think that arguing fundamentals is right right now, especially in a money market like this. I see it as being an attempt to attack a more ‘technical’ issue.
That would really be far out if we saw really negative interest rates from the fed to banks. Remember all that ‘next rate decision upward’ talk? what a croc