China Reconsidering One-Child Policy
China’s one-child policy is a triumph of responsible planning.
China says its policies have prevented several hundred million births and boosted prosperity, but experts have warned of a looming social time-bomb from an aging population and widening gender disparity stemming from a traditional preference for boys. With the world’s biggest population straining scarce land, water and energy resources, China has enforced rules to restrict family size since the 1970s. Rules vary but usually limit families to one child, or two in the countryside.”
The problem in China is the same one Italy and Japan are facing: with the birthrate hovering lower than the replacement rate of 2.1 children per female, a country’s population ages while the younger generation comparatively shrinks in size. This poses problems of logistics, economics, and taxation, as a smaller workforce could be stretched too thin to support an larger society.
China’s birthrate is 1.8 children per female.
“We want incrementally to have this change,” Vice Minister of the National Population and Family Planning Commission Zhao Baige told reporters in Beijing.“ Still, the government has previously expressed concern that too many people are flouting the rules. State media said in December that China’s population would grow to 1.5 billion people by 2033, with birth rates set to soar over the next five years. Officials have also cautioned that population controls are being unraveled by the increased mobility of China’s 150 million-odd migrant workers, who travel from poor rural areas to work in more affluent eastern cities. China has vowed to slap heavier fines on wealthy citizens who flout family planning laws in response to the emergence of an upper class willing to pay standard fines to have more children.
China already fines those with the means for having more children, but what is missing is a national target for births linked to a variable fine to keep births in line with their desired projection. This would allow anyone to have as many children as they want (as long as they are willing to pay for the extra strain their children exert on society’s resources), while ensuring that population growth doesn’t get out of control. Also, there are some external effects that would be very positive. For instance, allowing only the wealthy to have more than one or two children ensures that those children will have access to better education and more opportunities. As we’ve seen in North America, where everyone is allowed to reproduce without fine or consequence, we see the opposite effect: that of more reproduction among the poorer classes, who likely have less time and resources to ensure their children have every opportunity in education and personal development.
My hope is that China makes only subtle changes to its already very successful program, for the benefit of both the Chinese people and the world.
China may scrap one-child policy, official says
Comments
No comments yet.
Leave a comment
Categories
- Featured (491)
- Politics (250)
- Humor (190)
- No F***ing Way (187)
- Business (171)
- Music (171)
- Philosophy (158)
- Finance (145)
- Quotes (136)
- Seattle (119)
- Technology (112)
- Economics (100)
- Europe (96)
- Conversations (86)
- Emerging Markets (67)
- Must. Have. (64)
- Fashion (60)
- Photography (57)
- The Web (57)
- Cellphones (49)
- Design (39)
- Out and About (38)
- Travel (34)
- Responsible Population (32)
- Sports (30)
- Video (29)
- What I'm Reading (28)
- Gotham (27)
- City of Angels (25)
- History (24)
- Health (18)
- Restaurants (9)
- Movies (6)
- F1 (3)
- Art (3)
Links
- Adam Wes Academics – Math Tutoring
- AkihabaraNews
- Ars Technica
- ArtsOne – seattle arts events – visual art, symphony, opera, ballet, openings, and socials
- El Blog Salmon
- Hot Chicks In Hijabs
- Intellitutoring
- Le 21ème Arrondissement
- Manual Gear
- Minimum Wage Gilded Age
- My Bookshelf
- My Music Charts
- My Photos
- My Profile
- ProConscious
- The Foggy Monocle
- The Sartorialist
- The Superficial
Archive
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- June 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- March 2007
- July 2005
- May 2004
- July 1999


